Epigenetic Basis of Twin Discordance in Diseases: Future Benefits

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21613/GORM.2017.741

Keywords:

Monozygotic twins, Epigenetic mechanisms

Abstract

Monozygotic twins share the same genotype since they are derived from the same zygote. However, monozygotic (MZ) twin siblings frequently present many phenotypic differences, such as their susceptibilities to diseases. These isogenic individuals are not entirely identical. They exhibit phenotypic incompatibility for many features, from birth weight to complex diseases. Recently, several studies have been published showing that phenotypic differences, especially in MZ twins, are being induced from prenatal period to life-long epigenetic differences. Epigenetic studies on twins have a great potential to contribute to our understanding of complex diseases, such as cancer, autoimmune disorders, psychiatric disorders and neurological diseases. Since MZ twins are genetic clones (genetically identical), they are considered as perfect models for studying the role of environmental factors as determinants of complex diseases and phenotypes. In this review, a number of intrauterine effects and genetic mechanisms that may affect phenotypic, genotypic, and epigenetic differences between MZ twins were described and effects of epigenetic mechanisms on complex diseases were mentioned. Further work on epigenetic changes in diseases using incompatible MZ twin models, would lead to new developments in medical therapies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Ayse Banu Demir, Özel Kent Hastanesi, İzmir

Izmir University of Economics, Faculty of Medicine, Dept. of Medical Biolog

Namik Demir, Özel Kent Hastanesi, İzmir

Izmir Kent Hospital, Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Downloads

Published

2018-08-10

How to Cite

1.
Demir AB, Demir N. Epigenetic Basis of Twin Discordance in Diseases: Future Benefits. Gynecol Obstet Reprod Med [Internet]. 2018Aug.10 [cited 2024Dec.22];24(2):108-1. Available from: https://gorm.com.tr/index.php/GORM/article/view/741

Issue

Section

Review