Cervical Priming with Hydroscopic Dilatator Before Hysteroscopy: Effect on Pain Scores and Ease of the Procedure

Authors

  • Aslı Yarcı Gürsoy Ufuk University Faculty of Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Ankara
  • Mine Kiseli Ufuk University Faculty of Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Ankara
  • Gamze Sinem Çağlar Ufuk University Faculty of Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Ankara
  • Perihan Ekmekçi Ufuk University Faculty of Medicine, Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department, Ankara
  • Hakan Yılmaz Ufuk University Faculty of Medicine, Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department, Ankara
  • Recai Pabuccu Ufuk University Faculty of Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Ankara
  • Sevim Dinçer Cengiz Ufuk University Faculty of Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Ankara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21613/GORM.2016.68

Keywords:

Hydroscopic dilatator, Hysteroscopy, Pain, Cervical priming

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Aquacryl hydrogel is one of the cervical dilatators which is a synthetic rigid hydroscopic gel rod, indicated to be used for cervical preparation. The authors aimed to determine whether preoperative cervical preparation with Aquacryl hydrogel before hysteroscopy has any favorable effects either for the patient (pain scores) or for the surgeon (ease of the procedure).
STUDY DESIGN: The randomized controlled trial was undertaken in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of a University setting. Forty-three reproductive age women scheduled for hysteroscopy due to gynecological indications were randomized to receive hydroscopic dilatators for cervical preparation (n=19) or no intervention before the procedure (n=27). Visual analog scale (VAS) was used to evaluate pain scores until the operation. Analgesic administration was done in case of a VAS score ≥40 or patients’ demand for analgesia.Intraoperatively, mean arterial pressure and pulse were documented in order to evaluate analgesic requirement.
RESULTS: Median VAS scores at hydroscopic dilatator administration 0th, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th hours after insertion were 29±24 (0 - 80), 14±15 (0 - 6), 13±15 (0 - 5), 8±9 (0 - 30) and 5±9 (0 -3), respectively; where pain score significantly decreased in time (p<0.05). There was no significant difference between mean arterial pressure and heart rate values between groups throughout the preoperative and intraoperative follow up (p>0.05).
CONCLUSION: This study revealed that, Aquacryl hydrogel for cervical priming before office hysteroscopy is not effective to reduce the pain of patients’ during the procedure but also does not ease access to the uterine cavity. Therefore, it is not advantageous for the patient to use this agent before hysteroscopy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Aslı Yarcı Gürsoy, Ufuk University Faculty of Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Ankara

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Mine Kiseli, Ufuk University Faculty of Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Ankara

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Gamze Sinem Çağlar, Ufuk University Faculty of Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Ankara

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Perihan Ekmekçi, Ufuk University Faculty of Medicine, Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department, Ankara

Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department

Hakan Yılmaz, Ufuk University Faculty of Medicine, Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department, Ankara

Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department

Recai Pabuccu, Ufuk University Faculty of Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Ankara

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Sevim Dinçer Cengiz, Ufuk University Faculty of Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Ankara

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Downloads

Published

2016-12-28

How to Cite

1.
Gürsoy AY, Kiseli M, Çağlar GS, Ekmekçi P, Yılmaz H, Pabuccu R, Cengiz SD. Cervical Priming with Hydroscopic Dilatator Before Hysteroscopy: Effect on Pain Scores and Ease of the Procedure. Gynecol Obstet Reprod Med [Internet]. 2016Dec.28 [cited 2024Nov.22];22(3):149-51. Available from: https://gorm.com.tr/index.php/GORM/article/view/68

Issue

Section

Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology