Uterine Rupture During Labor in a Patient that Had Undergone Repetitive Uncomplicated Hysteroscopic Metroplasty
Keywords:
Hysteroscopy, Metroplasty, Uterine rupture, Uterine septumAbstract
Hysteroscopic surgery when performed by a well-trained hysteroscopic surgeon is a safe procedure with an overall complication rate of 3%, and the complications comprise uterine perforation, excessive hemorrhage, air embolus, pulmonary edema, excessive glycine absorption, and infection. After hysteroscopic septum resection, a remnant uterine septum might be visualized on control hysterosalpingography or control hysteroscopy. Kormanyos et al. observed a remnant uterine septum in 38% of patients after initial hysteroscopic metroplasty. In our case hysteroscopy was performed twice without complications. We used two different techniques in the same patient; the first involved a resectoscope with a
unipolar electrode and the second involved a Versapoint with a bipolar electrode. Although these two operation types appear to be similar, hysteroscopic metroplasty with Versapoint is a safe and effective alternative to the operative resectoscope. Our case demonstrates a rare but dramatic complication of hysteroscopic metroplasty. Uterine perforation during hysteroscopic metroplasty is accepted as a risk factor
for uterine rupture in pregnancy. The extensive enlargement of the uterus during pregnancy might be a reasonable cause of uterine rupture in patients that have undergone hysteroscopic metroplasty previously.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All the articles published in GORM are licensed with "Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (CC BY 4.0)". This license entitles all parties to copy, share and redistribute all the articles, data sets, figures and supplementary files published in this journal in data mining, search engines, web sites, blogs and other digital platforms under the condition of providing references.